Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Gloryhole Meeting Long Island
Mint is a design studio formed by Andrea Blanche, Paulina Fuenzalida, Marcelo Moya and Jose Pinto. This is our animation reel and promptly is our website. Health
{I}!
Remove Write Protected Micro Sdhc Without Adapter
Dichotomy of objects Resizor
I do not mean the objects themselves, but to use are given and more importantly, the identity that represent or are chosen to represent. The objects are targets in passing what they are: "I'm an iPod, I'm rectangular, with rounded edges, I'm white, I have a half metal, a touch wheel and a screen , however, are the subject of that charge these objects from the always beleaguered subjectivity, which allows anything can be possible and that is the best way to defend fome {} while ending a conversation, where an iPod remains a music player and go on to become, and make his own way part of an elite style, coolness and good taste.
Continue Reading ...
I do not mean the objects themselves, but to use are given and more importantly, the identity that represent or are chosen to represent. The objects are targets in passing what they are: "I'm an iPod, I'm rectangular, with rounded edges, I'm white, I have a half metal, a touch wheel and a screen , however, are the subject of that charge these objects from the always beleaguered subjectivity, which allows anything can be possible and that is the best way to defend fome {} while ending a conversation, where an iPod remains a music player and go on to become, and make his own way part of an elite style, coolness and good taste. Subjects we
We object to represent us and express our identity from our shoes to our music player. These objects can be, in some cases, the same for different subjects and these objects and cease to be and the same thing. A good example is the vintage clothing, where grandpa pants does not mean the same thing for the young grandpa lolo that it acquired or transmitted the same if you use one or the other. How strange it is that an object remains the same and both changed so much.
Another dichotomy, in my view, is given in the categories proposed by David Readhead on "Products of the time," said Juan Guillermo Tejeda interpreted in "Critical Dictionary del Diseño" . Estas categorías son las de Básico y Más.
Básico se refiere a lo simple y esencial de los objetos, donde estos se sacuden todo lo sobrante y se presentan como sintetizados en su función. Es "el minimalismo, la ausencia de sofisticaciones derivadas o de detalle", en un mundo que bombardea información constantemente y en todas direciones.
Más se refiere a lo contrario: a la "superabundancia", el exceso, la acumulación de objetos, la veloz obsolescencia de los mismos, la vertiginosa cadena de consumismo, los desechos, etc. Bruno Munari, en su texto "Como Nacen Los Objetos" refers to something similar: Luxury.
is curious, at least for me, seeing as collections of objects behave in different socioeconomic groups. While the sophistication points to sobriety, minimalist rooms spacious and air-visual, limited palette, control over library when choosing to integrate it and that things things, etc., the most popular plays it by the color, it charged, the mixture of trends and styles, materials, erratic distribution, etc. It is one thing to see Alonso de Cordova store and a bazaar in Meiggs.
What causes this? causing a higher class chooses the basics while one opts for the most popular? I think it has to do with another status appear to show off by excessive and meaningless, and a lack of aesthetic sense can be understood a bit by Avant-garde and Kitsch definition gives Umberto Eco in Apocalíticos and Embedded where class Vanguard High-generated {all} that order of things while being used, decanted into the lower classes, which was reproduced and used without defined criteria, which transformed this object was once an object Vanguard and Kitsch bad taste. Example: laser pointers. My dad was a dentist and professor at Valpo. The year 98 went to Europe and bought a laser pointer at a store X, because I found it very useful for teaching and exhibitions. It cost about $ 25,000, or so cheap it was. Since 99 years I remember going to the Festival of Viña and see one of the first manifestations of the classic laser in the eye of Vodanovic poor. Laser pointers sold in the gutter to $ 1,500.
This is a course required for the production of new objects and creative, because when the lead becomes kitsch and the lower classes access to technology that previously handled only the elite, the lower class began to "climb" in social classes and as the elite do not like sharing his step, then generate new products and breakthrough technologies that lower class away until it becomes kitsch art and the cycle start again. So next time you go to San Diego Chinese mall, be charitable, buy some gift of Easter and collaborate well with the next Mac has multi-touch screen and operates on the basis of proto-culture.
Continue Reading ...
I do not mean the objects themselves, but to use are given and more importantly, the identity that represent or are chosen to represent. The objects are targets in passing what they are: "I'm an iPod, I'm rectangular, with rounded edges, I'm white, I have a half metal, a touch wheel and a screen , however, are the subject of that charge these objects from the always beleaguered subjectivity, which allows anything can be possible and that is the best way to defend fome {} while ending a conversation, where an iPod remains a music player and go on to become, and make his own way part of an elite style, coolness and good taste. Subjects we
We object to represent us and express our identity from our shoes to our music player. These objects can be, in some cases, the same for different subjects and these objects and cease to be and the same thing. A good example is the vintage clothing, where grandpa pants does not mean the same thing for the young grandpa lolo that it acquired or transmitted the same if you use one or the other. How strange it is that an object remains the same and both changed so much.
Another dichotomy, in my view, is given in the categories proposed by David Readhead on "Products of the time," said Juan Guillermo Tejeda interpreted in "Critical Dictionary del Diseño" . Estas categorías son las de Básico y Más.
Básico se refiere a lo simple y esencial de los objetos, donde estos se sacuden todo lo sobrante y se presentan como sintetizados en su función. Es "el minimalismo, la ausencia de sofisticaciones derivadas o de detalle", en un mundo que bombardea información constantemente y en todas direciones.
Más se refiere a lo contrario: a la "superabundancia", el exceso, la acumulación de objetos, la veloz obsolescencia de los mismos, la vertiginosa cadena de consumismo, los desechos, etc. Bruno Munari, en su texto "Como Nacen Los Objetos" refers to something similar: Luxury.
"Luxury is the manifestation of the wealth they want to impress
who is poor. It is the triumph of appearance over substance
about what really matters. The estate is fiction, is the improper use of costly materials and
functions that do not improve. The model is no longer the luxury and wealth as previously
. Luxury is not a design problem. "
is curious, at least for me, seeing as collections of objects behave in different socioeconomic groups. While the sophistication points to sobriety, minimalist rooms spacious and air-visual, limited palette, control over library when choosing to integrate it and that things things, etc., the most popular plays it by the color, it charged, the mixture of trends and styles, materials, erratic distribution, etc. It is one thing to see Alonso de Cordova store and a bazaar in Meiggs.
What causes this? causing a higher class chooses the basics while one opts for the most popular? I think it has to do with another status appear to show off by excessive and meaningless, and a lack of aesthetic sense can be understood a bit by Avant-garde and Kitsch definition gives Umberto Eco in Apocalíticos and Embedded where class Vanguard High-generated {all} that order of things while being used, decanted into the lower classes, which was reproduced and used without defined criteria, which transformed this object was once an object Vanguard and Kitsch bad taste. Example: laser pointers. My dad was a dentist and professor at Valpo. The year 98 went to Europe and bought a laser pointer at a store X, because I found it very useful for teaching and exhibitions. It cost about $ 25,000, or so cheap it was. Since 99 years I remember going to the Festival of Viña and see one of the first manifestations of the classic laser in the eye of Vodanovic poor. Laser pointers sold in the gutter to $ 1,500.
This is a course required for the production of new objects and creative, because when the lead becomes kitsch and the lower classes access to technology that previously handled only the elite, the lower class began to "climb" in social classes and as the elite do not like sharing his step, then generate new products and breakthrough technologies that lower class away until it becomes kitsch art and the cycle start again. So next time you go to San Diego Chinese mall, be charitable, buy some gift of Easter and collaborate well with the next Mac has multi-touch screen and operates on the basis of proto-culture.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)